Multiple Choice

Which method of statutory interpretation focuses on the plain, ordinary meaning of the statute's words?

Literal Rule

The literal rule involves interpreting statutes based strictly on the ordinary meaning of the words used.
In which method can judges modify a statute's interpretation to avoid absurd outcomes?

Golden Rule

The golden rule is applied when the literal interpretation of a statute leads to an absurd or unreasonable result.
Which method of interpretation focuses on the problem the statute was intended to address?

Mischief Rule

The mischief rule addresses the problem or 'mischief' the statute was meant to solve, providing a contextual interpretation.
Which method involves interpreting statutes based on the broader legislative purpose?

Purposive Approach

The purposive approach interprets statutes based on the broader legislative intent or purpose behind the law.
Which case is an example of the literal rule in statutory interpretation?

Fisher v Bell

In Fisher v Bell, the court applied the literal rule, interpreting the statute based on its exact wording.
Which case illustrates the use of the golden rule in statutory interpretation?

R v Allen

R v Allen is an example of the golden rule, where the court modified the literal meaning of a statute to prevent an absurd outcome.
Which case is an example of the mischief rule in statutory interpretation?

Smith v Hughes

In Smith v Hughes, the mischief rule was used to interpret a statute addressing street solicitation by women.
Which case demonstrates the purposive approach in statutory interpretation?

R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health

This case exemplifies the purposive approach, as the court interpreted legislation to address new medical technologies.
Which method of interpretation is most likely to promote certainty and predictability?

Literal Rule

The literal rule is based on applying the statute's text as written, promoting consistency and predictability.
Which method helps prevent unjust or absurd outcomes in statutory interpretation?

Golden Rule

The golden rule allows for modification of the literal meaning when it leads to unfair or absurd results.
Which method is known for providing a flexible, contextual interpretation of the law?

Mischief Rule

The mischief rule is flexible and addresses gaps in the law, making it suitable for dealing with unforeseen issues.
Which method is ideal for addressing modern challenges and ensuring the law stays relevant?

Purposive Approach

The purposive approach adapts to modern challenges, ensuring the law remains relevant to contemporary issues.
What is a major drawback of the mischief rule in statutory interpretation?

Judicial overreach

The mischief rule can lead to judicial overreach because it allows judges to extend or modify the law based on context.
What is a major disadvantage of the purposive approach in statutory interpretation?

Potential for judicial activism

The purposive approach can lead to judicial activism, as judges may impose their views on the law's purpose.
Which method of interpretation might lead to unfair or absurd outcomes?

Literal Rule

The literal rule can result in outcomes that are unjust or absurd because it strictly follows the text.
What is a major drawback of the golden rule in statutory interpretation?

Subjectivity in defining 'absurd'

The golden rule's application is subjective because what is considered 'absurd' can vary from case to case.
Which method allows for interpreting laws in a way that aligns with their broader goals?

Purposive Approach

The purposive approach goes beyond the literal text to apply the law in a way that aligns with its broader goals.
Which method focuses on the gap or issue the law was meant to address?

Mischief Rule

The mischief rule involves looking at the statute's purpose, which can lead to addressing gaps or issues not explicitly covered by the law.
Which method is most likely to be challenged by outdated or rigid interpretations?

Literal Rule

The literal rule is based on the exact wording of the statute, which may not account for changes over time.